Comments

New Video Preview for Episode 19 of Joseon Gunman — 8 Comments

  1. I wholeheartedly agree. We must get hardcore romance between our otp. It’s long overdue. I too wish more can enjoy this drama with us because it’s just so good. I thought I have to take a break from sageuk after Empress Ki, but I never thought I’d enjoy it again in watching Joseon Gunman.

  2. I think it’s not actually many people are not watching this show but rather more people are dropping show.It may have good rating in Korea but the international fans are finding this drama very appealing. As for me, the same-face-different-identity disguise just doesn’t work for me.

    • JG is the perfect safe “family show” in his time slot for Koreans. The others being about adultery and crazy people smooching in every scene…
      I like LJK in certain dramas where he can shine (Hero, 2 Weeks) but nothing interests me here.

      • Ooops. I mixed everything. FTLY, not Temptation. Other type of crazies anyway. ๐Ÿ˜‰

  3. Sorry as this is off topic but I wanted to tell you, Koala, that Dispatch released Kim Hyunjoong’s ex-GF medical proof of abuse. The pictures of her abuse ๐Ÿ™

  4. I KNOW THEY DID IF U ARE SAD I AM SADER DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO.I HOPE THEY INVESTIGATE AND THE REAL TRUTH JUST COME OUT.WELL I AM A ACTION FAN IF U MUST KNOW I THINK I WILL NOT LET HIM GO.

  5. I’m with you about that romance. It’s time for the romance to get ‘dialed up’. I’m not a big sageuk person, but do enjoy this one. I think
    Lee Joon Gi and the rest of the cast are doing a great job. Thanks too for your quick recaps.

  6. Well, I guess it’s just not the right drama for the masses, particularly the international crowd. Ftyl is a much better fit. But I am still hanging in here. I love LJK and NSM – and I think JG is underrated. I too wouldn’t mind if they dialed up the romance a bit, or a lot. ๐Ÿ™‚

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

error: Content is protected !!