Comments

First Look at So Yi Hyun, Taecyeon, and Kim Jae Wook in tvN’s Who Are You — 23 Comments

  1. I love Taec… I really do… But how can anyone even notice him with Kim Jae Wook in the same picture?? I can’t wait!!! I need more cute in my drama list….

    • MariD
      I think Taec will be okay, after all this is a fair and epic battle, between Strong Men Jawline (Teac) and High Men Cheekbone (KJW).

  2. KIM JAE-WOOK~~~!!!! ~epic flail~

    Speaking of him stealing dramas, I want a drama where he and MGY are the OTP STAT. That needs to happen, drama gods! ~shakes fist at the sky~

  3. KIM JAE WOOOOOOOOOOOK!! In Coffee Prince I was so taken with him just like YEH’s sister in the show… even Gong Yoo paled in comparison which is quite telling.

  4. My love for Taecyeon…can’t wait for this drama!!! Him with the gun…hhhmmm…super manly love it!!! 🙂

  5. Taecyeon is my bias. Loved him to bits since cinderella’s sister. Their connection to moon geun young made me love them more.

  6. Leave it to tVN to make things more interesting.
    I have a profound respect and appreciation for cable shows (although they are fallible) because they churn out some really great ones that rival the big 3. I’m keeping an open-mind for both the Hong Sister’s Master’s Sun and for Who are you — you never know which ends up being the better one. Although i think Who Are You might end up being better qualitatively yet lowkey, while Master’s Sun has more popularity. Just my prediction but i could be wrong. Taecyeon is going to be Who Are You’s weakest link and that boy better pull through on his end. Hope the Hong Sisters have recovered since their last epic fail BIG.
    On a side note, Koala, have you seen Cruel City’s OMG ending of ep 10 and just the overal OMGness of eps 9&10?! Im going crazy having to wait for next weeks episodes. Ugh why did i have to start this show before it ended?

    • Can we talk about the beginning of episode 10 too? Because I was not expecting THAT. (and I freely admit to rewinding to watch. Twice.)

      • I admit to rewinding several times so i guess i beat you. ha
        sexy sexy sexy!
        Leave it to cable to also be the most daring.

  7. As soon as I heard that Kim Jae Wook was going to join this drama it automatically put it on my must watch list. Plus the storyline sounds interesting and so far I’ve like the dramas from tvN that I’ve seen.

  8. KJW looks so hot but I guess we’ll see him only in this outfit for the entire drama. Sigh. Can we have something like that of Bad Guy where he looked so fine as if he’s always walking on a ramp or something…

  9. This looks so promising, love them all but why does he have to be a 2nd lead?? I just have major second lead syndrome when it comes to KJW.

  10. Wah2, finally something new this year after all the sageuk. The story plot sounds so interesting too, yay.

    I like this kind of spirit drama like 49 days..
    Thanks for updating

  11. Damn it, why does Kim Jae-wook have to be second lead ALL the time, I don’t mind it when the actor he’s up against is a competent first lead (Kim Nam-gil, JGS) but this….eh. I’ll still try it anyway, or see how much of it I can try before Taec’s woodenness makes me peace out.

  12. this sounds vaguely like natsuyuki rendezvous – an anime where the love triangle involves a young man smitten with a widow, but the dead husband’s ghost is still around; can’t really say much for TC and the female lead but KJW! ahhhhhh now i have to keep a eye on this

  13. Anyone noticed that Taecyeon has the exact same expression for both photos? I actually thought maybe they had the same copy of his character-still for both, until I realised his posture was actually different, WHICH MEANS THE BOY STILL CANNOT EMOTE T_T

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

error: Content is protected !!