Comments

Park Eun Bin and Ro Woon Bring Contrasting Serious and Swoony Vibes in First Stills for KBS Sageuk Affection — 9 Comments

  1. Pingback:Park Eun Bin and Ro Woon Bring Contrasting Serious and Swoony Vibes in First Stills for KBS Sageuk Affection - Kpopnchill - All About K-pop News

  2. PEB is a very good looking Prince. And looks more masculine than a lot of cross- dressing actresses in both Kdramas and Cdramas.

    I admit to being surprised at how good looking she is as a male.

    • Me too! She’s got the expression and posture in these stills. And the stills not showing her height helps. Those royal robes always make shoulders look broader too so you can’t see her narrow shoulders.

  3. She still looks feminine. Can’t hide the fact that she’s a girl based on the stills. But if her voice is deep enough to convince viewers then it is good enough.

    Rowoon’s visual is good but everything will depend on how good the story is and how masterful the director is in weaving a story that will hook us viewers to watch every week. I hope they have highly competent actors to play the main villain.

  4. She still looks very female so that’s going to be suspension of disbelief but the drama looks good. KBS sageuk dramas this year have been excellent so expect this to follow the same pattern.

  5. Pingback:Park Eun Bin and Ro Woon Bring Contrasting Serious and Swoony Vibes in First Stills for KBS Sageuk Affection – SanIsidro

  6. Park Eun Bin in the first still give me Im Siwan vibe in saeguk ?
    I can’t wait to watch, I read the summary of manhwa and it looks promising

  7. I’m so ready for all the shenigans to hide the fact she’s a woman, she’s falling for him, etc.

    They both look great in their costume.

  8. Damn, PEB looks incredible in every still so far! And Rowoon is, well, Rowoon, and he looks like a sparkling Joseon-era Adonis at his prime. Just so, so gorgeous. This drama really can’t come fast enough lol just release it already.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

error: Content is protected !!